What is the difference between atl and mfc

When Windows is upgraded to bit, COM is also upgraded to bit. COM is like some encapsulated class objects. It provides some standard methods for you to use by encapsulating system APIs.

So what components are in the system, what method can be used in ATL. The disadvantage of the ATL library is that as a template library, it will be more troublesome when there is an error, and the error prompt will be wrong. Write My Article. I only know that COM has a bit version. When Windows is upgraded to bit, COM is also upgraded to bit. COM is like some encapsulated class objects. It provides some standard methods for you to use by encapsulating system APIs.

So what components are in the system can be used in ATL. The disadvantage of the ATL library is that as a template library, it will be more troublesome when there is an error, and the error prompt will be wrong. Tech Community Register Log in. MFC represents a simple and consistent means of creating standalone applications for Windows; Microsoft created MFC to make the development of applications for Windows much easier than it was using the SDK.

The two frameworks overlap in their usefulness for developing ActiveX controls. The differences between the two architectures are fairly stark. Generally, MFC enables you to get your project up and running more quickly, but sacrifices flexibility.

In addition, ATL appears to be getting easier to use as it matures. Messenger with Voice. No Account? It has never been much appreciated by programmers, as far as I know, and it is now outdated. I wouldn't learn it unless you have to, i. Today, Microsoft has decided to move away from all of the above. They are now focusing on. NET platform natively, meaning the "object model" is common to all programs by design, since they all run on the same platform.

ATL is not required either, obviously. In some sense,. NET is similar to Java's virtual machine or run-time environment, they are heavy-weight software platforms that run on top of the OS, which is a flawed concept to start with, in my opinion micro-kernel concepts are far superior if you ask me.

And wikipedia seems to agree with me, for what it's worth. We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts learning and sharing knowledge. Answered by Ancient Dragon 5, in a post from 10 Years Ago.